Having multiple pages for each Dos games and applications doesn't seems to be a good idea to me. A page with the information for all games and applications is probably a better idea. Or a dedicated website with his own wiki/forum.--mongolito404 07:59, 19 February 2006 (PST)

Yea someones welcome to change this but it was the only way I could see it working as there are different file configs needed per game. Unless someone adds a whole Dosbox Config section in the archive where you could just upload the configs there.--Kcar181 11:04, 19 February 2006 (EST)
What about a DosBox:Games page, like this one ?--mongolito404 09:39, 19 February 2006 (PST)
I dunno that would get to be a very big page after a while--Kcar181 12:44, 19 February 2006 (EST)
actually, a page per game would be OK if the compatability chart on the dosbox page linked to each of those seperate pages. having all the dosbox games on one page is ok as well. even if it gets big i would prefer that to yet-another-site to check! Starpause 21:43, 9 March 2006 (PST)
Yep, you are right about the "very big page" problem. One page per game is probably the best solution. Maybe a DosBox:Games category and a Dosbox:Games template is a good solution too, to get automatic linking and a standard layout.
No, it isn't the best solution, it's a solution, yes, but a very messy one. Orkie 03:45, 22 August 2007 (PDT)

Mouse support

The GP2X port of DOSBox does not have mouse support. Will somebody just improve DOSBox to have mouse emulation, of please make a .EXE patch that will allow the arrow keys to act as if the mouse cursor was moving? --SamuraiClinton 18:16, 2 April 2006 (PDT)

Personal tools